Archive for Politics – Page 2

An Eagar Christmas Collage

Sunday, December 26th, 2010

It’s been a stretch since my last blog post.  We’ve been working hard on immigration issues.  I’m finishing up a manuscript for a new book and balancing time with family for the holidays.  We have some announcements we’ll be making in 2011, but before the new year rolls around, Randy and I hope you have had a Merry Christmas and we pray that the New Year will bring more peace and prosperity to all. 

We’d like to recap some highlights of 2010 from behind the scenes with the Eagar family, poking a little bit of fun, remembering the serious, and always grateful for the lessons you have taught us.  Thank you all for being part of our most incredible year.  Please forgive if we did not find a photo of you to include.  You are in our hearts and memories.

Click on Eagar Christmas Collage 2010, and at the end of this Christmas Collage, be sure to click on the two links to watch two of our favorite Christmas music videos. 

Faithfully,

Cherilyn Eagar

Utah’s Legacy: Preserving the Future

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

The American Leadership Fund is currently supporting a campaign to raise funds to help pass the Utah Immigration Enforcement Act, and others like it around the nation.  The text of the proposed bill is found here and is an improved model of the Arizona law.  It will impact other states in the U.S. as well. 

“Utah’s Legacy: Preserving the Future” is a statement of principle regarding illegal immigration.  If you agree with these principles, please sign up today on the email sign-up tab above.   Your generous contribution is welcome by clicking on the American Leadership Fund tab above.   

Utah’s Legacy:  Preserving the Future 

A Principled Imperative 

Founding Father, author of The Declaration of Independence, and former United States President Thomas Jefferson said,

“Are there no inconveniences to be thrown into the scale against the advantage expected by a multiplication of numbers by the importation of foreigners? … Suppose 20 millions of republican Americans thrown all of a sudden into France, what would be the condition of that kingdom? … If it would be more turbulent, less happy, less strong, we may believe that the addition of half a million of foreigners to our present numbers would produce a similar effect here.”  

Alexander Hamilton maintained the safety of the republic depends,

“…essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment, on a uniformity of principles and habits, on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice, and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family.”   

In 1794, George Washington wisely stated,

“…the policy or advantage of [immigration] taking place in a body (I mean the settling of them in a body) may be much questioned; for, by so doing, they retain the language, habits, and principles (good or bad) which they bring with them. Whereas by an intermixture with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures, and laws: in a word, soon become one people.” 

WE SUPPORT AND DEFEND the U.S. Constitution and its original intent as our basis for resolve. 

WE UPHOLD Article VI, that requires both the federal government and the states to work together to uphold the law.  When that fails, Article I, Section 10, Clause 3, also gives states the right to defend their borders against “eminent danger.” 

WE AFFIRM the original intent of Amendment 14 to apply to the children of slaves who had been freed under Amendment 13, and not to the children of illegal immigrants, as there was no formal immigration law at the time.  Under Amendment 10, powers not enumerated to the federal government are given to the states.  Setting the qualifications of citizenship, not regulating immigration, was one of those limited, federally-enumerated powers.  Read More→

Utah Republican Party Chair Defends Caucus System

Saturday, October 9th, 2010
Republican Women, Utah politics

Professional Republican Women

On Thursday, October 7, 2010, the Professional Republican Women, a Salt Lake City-based organization, comprised of progressive, moderate and conservative and a few confused Republican women seeking answers, sponsored a debate on the question of whether or not Utah should keep its unique caucus-convention system or move to a general Primary system. As someone strongly in favor of the system, having published opinion in the Salt Lake Tribune on May 30, 2010, the caucus-convention system is truly a system created with, “…of the people, by the people and for the people…” in mind. Read More→

Children must be protected from violent video games

Monday, September 27th, 2010

WARNING:  Offensive sample material/videos within this article not suitable for children.

In 2009, Utah State Representative Mike Morley sponsored a bill to protect children from violent and pornographic video games. It passed overwhelmingly, but Governor Huntsman vetoed it. Recently, Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff sided with the ACLU and joined nine other states to challenge the constitutionality of California’s law prohibiting the sale of violent and pornographic video games to children, asserting it violates First Amendment “free speech.” But this is not about speech. It’s about images.  Read More→

Editors’ note:  A question being discussed in and around Utah Republican (and Democratic) circles and which will be debated at the next Professional Republican Womens’ meeting at Noon on Thursday, October 7 at the Utah State Capitol is, “Should Utah repeal its caucus-convention system and replace it with a Primary election system?” 

This is an unedited version of a guest editorial I wrote on this topic that appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune on May 30, 2010.  The details of how constitutional original intent has been perverted with regard to our election process is a topic for another time.   

May I simply say that Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison (the primary author) and the host of signers of the Constitution all clearly identified the form of government they created.  It was not a democracy.  It was a republic.  Most Americans have no clue what the difference is because they have not been taught it in school.   Neither was I.  That must change. Read More→